Most Active Stories
- Le Show For The Week Of Mar. 15, 2015
- Peter Sagal Says New Orleans Is The Best — And He'll Show Us A Great Time Thursday Night
- The Irish Have Been Part Of New Orleans From The Beginning
- Argo The Police Dog Forces Carjacking Suspect Hiding Inside Cemetery Tomb To Surrender
- Episode 609: The Curse Of The Black Lotus
Andre Perry Commentary
Fri August 10, 2012
Bringing Voucher Schools to the Light
Louisiana didn’t become 41st in the nation on average ACT score because of public school performance alone. Public schools can’t take all the blame for why Louisiana keeps looking up at its peers on the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Particularly in New Orleans, where 30 percent of the students attend private and parochial schools, the quality of this sector is critical to our city’s vitality.
However, the scrutiny around public education has by default inflated the perception of private schools. Sending your child to a private school shouldn’t just sound like you’re doing more. Other than reputation, how do you know if you should be satisfied with your child’s school?
The thought that your tuition may not yield a significant difference from the public sector is terrifying, but it’s a fear we must face.
As an educational researcher, I encourage opportunities to learn more about private and faith-based school performance. As a taxpayer, I want to see all schools improve. Louisiana’s voucher program provides the overall public an opportunity to understand what taxpayers and tuition-payers are getting in return. But instead, the Department of Education’s actions shroud the information that is requisite for parental choice.
The State’s long awaited accountability provisions for the voucher program proved to be a set of indefensible political compromises. Voucher schools will not receive similar consequences for under performance, particularly if they have fewer than 40 students (We assume 40 to be some magic number). If participating schools miseducate 40 or more, they can keep the students and the money. The failing schools just can’t enroll more students. Meanwhile, public schools are shuttered for such performances.
Jarvis Deberry of the Times-Picayune characterized it best within the title of an article on the subject, “A low bar is better than none.” Sadly, the Department’s shrinking away from true accountability limits Louisiana’s chances for advancement.
While the State demands rigor with End of Course examinations in assumed secular subjects such as Biology, Algebra and American History for its public schools, the Department of Education is accepting schools that advance creationism. How are state universities going to evaluate these subjects? Shouldn’t there be a reasonable amount of curricular consistency between the faith-based schools that the State accepts in its voucher program and the public schools that are purported as improving rapidly?
More importantly, do parents know the fullness of having their child attend the Light City Christian Academy whose students will “yield to the tutelage of Apostle Leonard Lucas Jr.” — a self-described prophet. A transparent application process for faith-based institutions would provide the information needed to promote the ideal of choice.
Again, Louisiana’s rank can’t fall solely on the shoulders of public schools. Bringing voucher schools to the light will make clear what is real; bad public schools aren’t the only educational institutions that need to close.